Razer Blade 16 2025 评测--游戏笔记本电脑现在配备GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑和更轻薄的机箱回归本源--这样行得通吗？ Razer Blade 16 2025 是首款配备全新 NvidiaGeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑的笔记本电脑，它运行 240-Hz OLED 面板。与此同时，Blade 16 再次大幅瘦身，这也意味着它现在使用了速度更慢的 AMD Ryzen 处理器。 Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 03/29/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇸🇪 🇹🇷 🇵🇱 🇭🇺 🇷🇺 AI AMD Blackwell RTX 5000 Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Wi-Fi 7 Windows Zen 5
结论 - 尽管机身纤薄，Razer Blade 16 的性能却给人留下了深刻印象当然，Razer Blade 2025 的有趣之处不仅在于其全新的GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑，还在于其明显纤薄的机身。最大 TGP 为 160 瓦，Razer 仍能将全新 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑的速度提升到极致。
另一个妥协是处理器较弱。虽然 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 的速度绝不慢，但与速度更快的 HX CPU 相比仍有差距，这在 1080p 分辨率下尤为明显。不过，在原生 QHD 分辨率下使用 5090 笔记本电脑玩游戏仍然没有任何问题，尤其是在包括光线追踪在内的最高设置下，5090 笔记本电脑会显示出它的优势。得益于多帧生成技术，性能还能进一步大幅提升，在《赛博朋克》中几乎可以达到 200 FPS（QHD + RT Overdrive）。不过，如果你已经拥有一台配备 RTX 4090 的游戏笔记本电脑，那么只有当你能使用额外的 8 GB VRAM 时，升级才真正值得。另一方面，对于目前使用 RTX 3000 GPU 的用户来说，升级绝对是有意义的。
Test device courtesy of NVIDIA
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
Blade 16 2025 的厚度仅为 17 毫米（约 0.67 英寸），重量约为 2 千克（约 4.4 磅），移动性很强，外壳的质量依然很高。但遗憾的是，表面仍然极易脏污。在维护选项方面，我们看到了退步，因为 Ryzen 处理器与焊接内存相结合。虽然键盘有所改进，但仍然比 ROG Zephyrus G16.
大型蒸发腔散热在噪音方面做得不错，但机箱温度有所上升。频率为 240 Hz 的 OLED 显示屏非常适合游戏，而且附带的色彩配置文件（P3 和 sRGB）校准效果极佳。只有 OLED 面板的 HDR 功能还有待改进。总的来说，新款 Razer Blade 2025 是一款出色的游戏笔记本电脑，尤其是移动性，同时还能为创意用户提供出色的性能。
Pros+ 坚固耐用的高品质外壳
+ 比以前更轻、更紧凑
+ 极高的游戏性能
+ 240-Hz OLED，色彩配置精确
+ 效率明显提高
+ 2x M.2-2280 固态硬盘改进的键盘
+ 改进的键盘Cons- RAM 无法扩展
- PWM 闪烁
- 机箱温度高
- 表面极易脏污
- HDR 亮度低
价格和供应情况新款 Razer Blade 16 可从Razer 网站订购，RTX 5090 选项从 4500 美元起。4 月 30 日开始发货。
$4,499.99Razer Blade 16 (2025) Gaming Laptop: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 CPU - QHD+ 240Hz OLED Display - 32GB LPDDR5x RAM - 2TB SSD PCIe Gen4 - Windows 11 - Copilot+ PC - Chroma RGB$5,999.99Razer Blade 18 (2026) Gaming Laptop — NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX, 18” UHD+ 240Hz / FHD+ 440Hz Dual Mode Display, 64GB DDR5 RAM, 2TB SSD, Wi-Fi 7, TB5, Windows 11$2,418.18Razer Blade 14 (2025) Gaming Laptop: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 - AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 CPU - 3K 120Hz OLED Display - 32GB LPDDR5X RAM - 1TB SSD - Thin & Lightweight - Chroma RGB - Windows - Black
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types ← exclude selected tags
Table of Contents结论 - 尽管机身纤薄，Razer Blade 16 的性能却给人留下了深刻印象规格外壳 - Blade 16 现在明显更薄设备 - USB 4 和 Wi-Fi 7输入设备 - 刀片 16 现在的按键行程为 1.5 毫米显示屏 - OLED，240 Hz 和 G-Sync性能 - Ryzen AI 和GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑排放 - 大型蒸汽腔电源管理 - 改进电池寿命Notebookcheck 整体估值
前几年，Razer Blade 16 曾是市场上速度最快的游戏笔记本电脑之一，而现在，Razer 推出了更轻薄的 2025 机型，更加回归本源。我们测试了这款配备 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370、32 GB 内存、2 TB SSD 存储和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑该机型的建议零售价为 4399 欧元（美国约为 4500 美元）。与旧款 刀锋 16相比，价格下降了 450 欧元（约合 485 美元）。
规格
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 (Blade 16 Series)ProcessorAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 12c/24t, 4 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5, 8 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c, 78 W PL2 / Short Burst, 75 W PL1 / Sustained, Strix Point-HX (Zen 5/5c)Graphics adapterNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop - 24 GB VRAM, Core: 1515 MHz, RAM: 1750 MHz, 160 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR7, 572.76, Advanced OptimusMemory32 GB , LPDDR5-8000, dual-channel, onboardDisplay16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, ATNA60DL04-0, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 240 HzMainboardAMD Promontory/Bixby FCHStorageSSSTC CA6-8D2048, 2048 GB , 1800 GB freeSoundcardAMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio ControllerConnections3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB4 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm stereo audio port, Card Reader: SDXCNetworkingMediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 17.4 x 355 x 250.5Battery90 Wh, 5780 mAh Lithium-IonOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 11 HomeCameraWebcam: 1080p + IRPrimary Camera: 2 MPixAdditional featuresSpeakers: Six speaker sound system, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 280W PSU, 12 Months WarrantyWeight2.09 kg, Power Supply: 795 g
Price4399 EuroLinksRazer homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - Blade 16 现在明显更薄新款 Razer Blade 16 薄了 30% 以上（14.9 - 17.4 毫米，0.587 - 0.685 英寸），但基本设计没有改变。依然是黑色铝制外壳（一体式机身设计），具有很高的稳定性。底座无法翘起，键盘也只能通过用力才能将中央区域压得很小。尽管盖子很薄，但仍然非常坚固，铰链的调整也非常到位。在任何角度（最大 135 度）下，盖子都能牢牢固定，移动后也只有轻微的晃动。在这方面，Blade 16 与华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 相比优势明显。它的做工非常出色，给人一种品质极高的感觉。
雷蛇仍然没有采用大量带照明的设计元素。除了键盘外，只有盖子上的 Razer 徽标会发光（可以关闭）。Blade 16 的用户必须做好定期清洁笔记本电脑的准备，因为其黑色表面是真正的指纹磁铁。不过大多数时候还是很容易清洁的。
底部有一块区域被抬高，为散热提供了更多空间。但这在日常操作中并不明显，而且高度差也不像ThinkPad X9 15 那样明显。
在尺寸对比中，Blade 16、ROG Zephyrus G16 以及 MacBook Pro 16几乎完全相同，而其他游戏笔记本电脑的体积则明显更大。2.1 千克（约 4.6 磅）的重量也与 MacBook 相当，但 Zephyrus G16 轻了近 200 克（约 7 盎司）。280 瓦充电器的重量为 795 克（约 28 盎司）。
尺寸比较
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY DIN A4 ❌
设备 - USB 4 和 Wi-Fi 7Blade 16 继续提供所有重要的连接。不过，它放弃了 Thunderbolt 4，只能通过 USB-C 适配器获得一个以太网端口。两个 USB-C 4.0 端口通过 iGPU 连接，因此当你添加外接显示器时，GeForce GPU 并不总是需要运行（HDMI 通过 dGPU 连接）。Blade 16 是一款 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑。
左：电源、2 个 USB-A 3.2 Gen.2、USB-C 4.0（40 Gbit/s、DisplayPort 1.4、Power Delivery 3.0）、3.5 毫米音频接口
右侧SD 读卡器、USB-C 4.0（40 Gbit/s、DisplayPort 1.4、Power Delivery 3.0）、USB-A 3.2 Gen.2、HDMI 2.1、Kensington 安全锁SD 读卡器读卡器位于右侧。在结合我们的参考卡（Angelbird AV Pro V60）复制图像文件时，传输速率最高可达 193 MB/s，最低为 133 MB/s。插入的卡会伸出机壳约 1 厘米（约 0.4 英寸）。
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
171 (169.48min - 194.55max) MB/s +29%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
168.9 MB/s +27%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro 14-Core (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
163.2 MB/s +23%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
133 MB/s Average of class Gaming (20.9 - 210, n=54, last 2 years)
126.4 MB/s -5%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
78.7 MB/s -41%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
76 MB/s -43%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
73 (51.3min - 77.05max) MB/s -45%maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
258 MB/s +34%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro 14-Core (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
239.1 MB/s +24%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
193.2 MB/s Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
181.81 MB/s -6%Average of class Gaming (25.5 - 261, n=51, last 2 years)
161.4 MB/s -16%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
89.9 MB/s -53%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
88.2 MB/s -54%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
87 MB/s -55%
交流AMD Blade 16 配备了联发科技（MediaTek）的无线局域网模块（MT7925）。除了目前的 Wi-Fi-7 标准外，它还支持蓝牙 5.4。与华硕路由器配合使用，传输速率非常好且稳定。在测试过程中，我们没有遇到任何信号质量问题。
NetworkingRazer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1781 (min: 1669) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1708 (min: 1681) MBit/s ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1018 (min: 656) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1689 (min: 843) MBit/s ∼99%
Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1393 (min: 771) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1298 (min: 794) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1216 (min: 706) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1281 (min: 925) MBit/s ∼77%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1378 (min: 539) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1562 (min: 657) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1569 (min: 771) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1660 (min: 1606) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1650 (min: 1594) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1696 (min: 1662) MBit/s ∼99%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW) iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1577 (min: 796) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1604 (min: 1554) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1538 (min: 784) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1518 (min: 762) MBit/s ∼91%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProBroadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1616 (min: 1558) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1591 (min: 1551) MBit/s ∼93%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1781 (1669-1877) MBit/sRazer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1708 (1681-1731) MBit/s
网络摄像头1080p 网络摄像头支持 Windows 的工作室特效，但不提供机械镜头盖。虽然图像质量不是特别好，但网络摄像头还是能胜任工作。此外，还有一个红外模块，可通过 Windows Hello 进行人脸识别。
10.9 ∆E15.2 ∆E16.5 ∆E13.9 ∆E16.1 ∆E18.6 ∆E10.7 ∆E19.7 ∆E14.6 ∆E13.1 ∆E12.6 ∆E9.8 ∆E12.7 ∆E13.4 ∆E19.1 ∆E8.1 ∆E17 ∆E19.8 ∆E2.3 ∆E11.4 ∆E16.8 ∆E15.2 ∆E12.2 ∆E7.9 ∆EColorChecker Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090: 13.65 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 19.77 ∆E
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
维护机箱底盖仅用几颗螺丝固定，可以顺利拆卸。机身内部与旧款相比有一些很大的不同 旧款机箱内有一个巨大的蒸汽腔和电池（旋入式），现在主要是散热装置。此外，还有两个用于 M.2-2280 固态硬盘的插槽，如果需要，还可以更换 WLAN 模块。不过，内存是焊接的。
内部
无线局域网模块
主 M.2-2280 固态硬盘
辅助 M.2-2280 SSD 插槽可持续性Razer 没有提供有关 Blade 16 可持续发展或环保认证的任何信息。
输入设备 - 刀片 16 现在的按键行程为 1.5 毫米老式键盘 刀锋 16的键盘是许多用户争议的焦点。虽然按压点很清晰，但按键行程却很浅，只有 1 毫米（约 0.04 英寸）。在新款 Blade 16 中，雷蛇将键程增加到了 1.5 毫米（约 0.06 英寸），这无疑改善了输入体验。不过，我们仍然不得不说，与其他游戏笔记本电脑相比，打字舒适度只能算一般。纤薄 ROG Zephyrus G16为例，其 1.7 毫米（约 0.07 英寸）键程的键盘要舒适得多。按照惯例，您可以单独更改每个按键的照明度，Razer 还提供了 Chroma 软件，让玩家可以根据具体情况调整照明度。
输入设备
键盘照明ClickPad 尺寸为 15 x 9.7 厘米（约 5.9 x 3.8 英寸），非常大，其玻璃表面具有出色的滑动特性。鼠标垫的底部区域可以进行物理点击，并发出均匀、饱满、不连续（因此是高质量）的点击声。
显示屏 - OLED，240 Hz 和 G-Sync子像素网格今年，三星 240-Hz OLED 的面板 ID 差别很小，但图像质量几乎完全相同，继续保持着极高的水平。色彩鲜艳，黑色饱和，响应速度极快。因此，这款显示器非常适合游戏。PWM 闪烁在所有亮度下都会出现，但其频率非常高，为 960 Hz，因此即使对敏感的用户也不会造成任何问题。
今年的亮度略低，约为 390 cd/m²，竞争对手通常会提供更好的数值。此外，HDR 的最大亮度也很低，仅为 431 cd/m²。另一方面，P3 和 sRGB 色彩空间的色彩配置文件在交货时已经非常准确（使用专业的 CalMAN 软件进行分析），我们无法进一步改进显示器。
394cd/m²391cd/m²394cd/m²391cd/m²391cd/m²393cd/m²391cd/m²391cd/m²397cd/m²
Distribution of brightnessATNA60DL04-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 397 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 392.6 cd/m² Minimum: 4.2 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 98 %Center on Battery: 391 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.72}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}85% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)99.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D)96.1% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)Gamma: 2.2CCT: 6493 K
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090ATNA60DL04-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 HzSchenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)BOE NE160QDM-NZA, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 HzAlienware x16 R2 P120FBOE B160QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 HzLenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090CSOT T3 MNG007ZA2-2, MiniLED, 3200x2000, 16", 165 HzAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYATNA60DL01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 HzRazer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Samsung SDC41AB (ATNA60DL03-0), OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 HzApple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProMini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2", 120 HzDisplay-15%2%0%6%5%3% Display P3 Coverage (%)96.170.2 -27%98.3 2%95.3 -1%99.9 4%99.1 3%99.7 4% sRGB Coverage (%)99.998 -2%100 0%99.9 0%100 0%99.9 0%100 0% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%)8570.6 -17%88.8 4%86.6 2%96.9 14%95.6 12%88.8 4%Response Times-3720%-2435%-3339%-8%-40%-12628% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1)11.2 ?(5.2, 6) -5500%3.9 ?(1.7, 2.2) -1850%12.6 ?(6.6, 6) -6200%0.22 ?(0.11, 0.11) -10%0.24 ?(0.15, 0.09) -20%43 ?(9.6, 33.4) -21400% Response Time Black / White * (ms)0.25 ?(0.13, 0.12)5.1 ?(1.6, 3.5) -1940%7.8 ?(3.9, 3.7) -3020%10 ?(5.2, 4.8) -3900%0.25 ?(0.13, 0.12) -0%0.4 ?(0.2, 0.2) -60%41.2 ?(24.5, 16.7) -16380% PWM Frequency (Hz)960 ?(100)5430960 ?(60)96014880 PWM Amplitude * (%)448 82%50 -14%90 -105%Screen-56%-46%-25%-7%6%48%Brightness middle (cd/m²)391530 36%348.4 -11%631 61%416 6%418 7%632 62%Brightness (cd/m²)393497 26%340 -13%664 69%418 6%420 7%616 57%Brightness Distribution (%)9885 -13%90 -8%91 -7%96 -2%98 0%95 -3%Black Level * (cd/m²)0.530.330.030.02Colorchecker dE 2000 *1.23.21 -168%2.68 -123%2.68 -123%1.6 -33%1.07 11%0.6 50%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *3.25.8 -81%4.14 -29%6.41 -100%2.1 34%4.04 -26%1.2 63%Greyscale dE 2000 *1.84.2 -133%3.4 -89%2.71 -51%2.7 -50%1.12 38%0.8 56%Gamma2.2 100%2.226 99%2.41 91%2.27 97%2.16 102%2.29 96%2.21 100%CCT6493 100%6448 101%6083 107%6135 106%6331 103%6417 101%6450 101%Contrast (:1)100010562103320900Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *1.440.422.681.07Total Average (Program / Settings)-1264% /
-711%-826% /
-467%-1121% /
-847%-3% /
-4%-10% /
-3%-4192% /
-3133%* ... smaller is better
CalMAN 灰度（配置文件：P3，目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN 饱和度（配置文件：P3，目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN ColorChecker（轮廓：P3，目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN 灰度（配置文件：本地，目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN 饱和度（配置文件：原生，目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：原生，目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN 灰度（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
CalMAN 饱和度（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）对比 sRGB
对 P3
对比 AdobeRGB
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White0.25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.13 ms rise↘ 0.12 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey0.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.1 ms rise↘ 0.1 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31 ms).
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 960 HzAmplitude: 44 % ≤ 100 % brightness settingThe display backlight flickers at 960 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.
The frequency of 960 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7778 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
PWM 闪烁（亮度为 0）
PWM 闪烁（20% 亮度）
PWM 闪烁（40% 亮度）
PWM 闪烁（60% 亮度）
PWM 闪烁（80% 亮度）
PWM 闪烁（100% 亮度）
在阳光下
室外（在没有阳光直射的晴朗天气）
视角稳定性性能 - Ryzen AI 和GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑为了在更轻薄的机身中使用更快的 GPU，Razer 将英特尔 HX CPU 更改为 AMD 的 Ryzen AI 移动处理器。您可以选择 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370或 Ryzen AI 9 365最高 64 GB 焊接内存（LPDDR5x-8000）。
测试条件Razer 提供多种电源配置文件，我们在下表列出了这些配置文件。为了获得最高性能，我们在基准测试和测量中使用了性能 模式。与 去年的型号相比，我们无法使用自定义 模式进一步提高性能。
模式
CPU TDP
CB R23 Multi
GPU TGP
Time Spy 图形
赛博朋克 2077 QHD Ultra
赛博朋克 2077 风扇体积
最大风扇体积
静音
35 瓦
18,105 分
110 瓦
17,919 分
84.5 FPS
43 dB(A)
45.7 dB(A)
平衡
55/46 瓦
20,651 点
125 瓦
19,487 点
87.3 FPS
48.2 dB(A)
50.8 dB(A)
性能
78/75 瓦
23,804 分
160 瓦
22,082 分
98.6 FPS
48.2 dB(A)
53.4 dB(A)
电池
52/40 瓦
19,112 点
65 瓦
10,464 点
34.8 FPS
40 dB(A)
40 dB(A)
处理器 - AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370产品 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370提供 12 个 CPU 内核，最大功耗为 78 瓦。基本上，它的多核性能不错，也比 2024 Zephyrus G16 配备的 酷睿至强 7 155H.但仍然落后于 酷睿 i9-14900HX当然，HX 处理器的功耗要高得多。在恒定负载下，性能保持稳定，但在电池工作状态下，多核性能下降约 20%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø3489 (3470.41-3505.08) PointsApple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max 16-Core: Ø3647 (3596.15-3782.15) PointsSchenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø5001 (4861.45-5267.14) PointsAlienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2753 (2708.56-2857.35) PointsLenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4648 (4505.52-4878.64) PointsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2756 (2704.71-3019.32) PointsRazer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4396 (4349.72-4455.83) Points
CPU Performance rating: Percent Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core) Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU 7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1 Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean CPU Performance rating
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max -8! Apple M4 Max 16-Core
86 pt Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX
85.4 pt Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 -2! Intel Core i9-14900HX
75 pt Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 -2! Intel Core i9-14900HX
68.9 pt Average of class Gaming
66.8 pt Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
66.6 pt Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
63.4 pt Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
61.6 pt Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 -2! Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
59 pt Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY -2! Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
57.2 pt Alienware x16 R2 P120F -2! Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
50.2 pt Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 16-Core
2069 Points +61%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 16-Core
2015 Points +57%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX
1940 Points +51%Average of class Gaming (486 - 2298, n=92, last 2 years)
1429 Points +11%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
1284 Points Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
1185 Points -8%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (621 - 1299, n=33)
1085 Points -15%Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 16-Core
178 Points +51%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX
131.7 Points +12%Average of class Gaming (95 - 138.2, n=92, last 2 years)
121.2 Points +3%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
118 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (113.6 - 121, n=23)
117 Points -1%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
115.5 Points -2%Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX
36249 Points +52%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
31889 Points +34%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
28867 Points +21%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 16-Core
27595 Points +16%Average of class Gaming (10488 - 40970, n=112, last 2 years)
25647 Points +8%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
23805 Points Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
22724 Points -5%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (10435 - 23902, n=32)
20658 Points -13%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
19851 Points -17%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
19110 Points -20%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
18338 (17139.2min - 18337.8max) Points -23%Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX
2209 Points +8%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 16-Core
2209 Points +8%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
2117 Points +4%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2039 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1921 - 2049, n=25)
2011 Points -1%Average of class Gaming (1166 - 2356, n=112, last 2 years)
1998 Points -2%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
1973 Points -3%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1906 Points -7%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
1876 Points -8%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
1720 Points -16%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
1620 Points -21%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX
13824 Points +49%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
11960 Points +29%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
10968 Points +19%Average of class Gaming (4029 - 16108, n=111, last 2 years)
9967 Points +8%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
9250 Points Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
8843 Points -4%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (6449 - 9280, n=24)
8379 Points -9%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7651 Points -17%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
7299 Points -21%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
7081 Points -23%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 16-Core
6995 Points -24%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX
844 Points +6%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
810 Points +1%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
800 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (737 - 804, n=24)
787 Points -2%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
777 Points -3%Average of class Gaming (442 - 895, n=111, last 2 years)
774 Points -3%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
735 Points -8%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
718 Points -10%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
657 Points -18%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
622 Points -22%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 16-Core
563 Points -30%Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX
5267 Points +50%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
4879 (4505.52min - 4878.64max) Points +39%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
4456 (4349.72min - 4455.83max) Points +27%Average of class Gaming (1578 - 6271, n=111, last 2 years)
3968 Points +13%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 16-Core
3647 (3596.15min, 3596.23P1 - 3782.15max) Points +4%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
3505 (3470.41min - 3505.08max) Points Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
3371 (3327.79min - 3370.98max) Points -4%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (2498 - 3551, n=24)
3234 Points -8%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
3019 (2704.71min - 3019.32max) Points -14%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
3005 (2869.44min - 3004.58max) Points -14%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
2857 (2708.56min - 2857.35max) Points -18%Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
311 Points 0%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX
310 Points 0%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
310 Points Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 16-Core
307 Points -1%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
303 Points -2%Average of class Gaming (188.8 - 343, n=111, last 2 years)
296 Points -5%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (188.8 - 315, n=24)
292 Points -6%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
280 Points -10%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
275 Points -11%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
247 Points -20%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
238 Points -23%Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
178 Seconds * -27%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
177 Seconds * -26%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
163 Seconds * -16%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (139 - 192, n=25)
155.4 Seconds * -11%Average of class Gaming (80 - 330, n=109, last 2 years)
152.5 Seconds * -9%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
145 Seconds * -4%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
140 Seconds * Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
113 Seconds * +19%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
106 Seconds * +24%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX
95 Seconds * +32%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX
135229 MIPS +62%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
125676 MIPS +50%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
115695 MIPS +38%Average of class Gaming (33491 - 148086, n=110, last 2 years)
89209 MIPS +7%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
83714 MIPS Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
82463 MIPS -1%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (66154 - 84735, n=24)
78580 MIPS -6%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
76331 MIPS -9%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
72583 MIPS -13%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
67227 MIPS -20%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX
7406 MIPS +18%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
7018 MIPS +12%Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7436, n=110, last 2 years)
6400 MIPS +2%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
6252 MIPS Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (5859 - 6497, n=24)
6172 MIPS -1%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
6127 MIPS -2%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
5781 MIPS -8%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
5651 MIPS -10%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
5452 MIPS -13%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
4502 MIPS -28%Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 16-Core
25760 Points +64%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX
19451 Points +24%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
17559 Points +12%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
17499 Points +12%Average of class Gaming (6625 - 22104, n=111, last 2 years)
15779 Points +1%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
15671 Points Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
15230 Points -3%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (11973 - 16311, n=26)
14644 Points -7%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
14540 Points -7%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
14031 Points -10%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
12825 Points -18%Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 16-Core
3880 Points +32%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX
3129 Points +6%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
2964 Points +1%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2942 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (2780 - 2965, n=26)
2886 Points -2%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2875 Points -2%Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3259, n=111, last 2 years)
2829 Points -4%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2570 Points -13%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
2559 Points -13%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
2419 Points -18%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
2199 Points -25%Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX
23086 Points +50%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
21642 Points +40%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
19372 Points +26%Average of class Gaming (6460 - 27010, n=110, last 2 years)
16885 Points +10%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
15407 Points Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
14774 Points -4%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (11394 - 16322, n=25)
14348 Points -7%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
14137 Points -8%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
13936 Points -10%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
12759 Points -17%Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX
2195 Points +3%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2136 Points Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
2131 Points 0%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2104 Points -1%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1957 - 2175, n=25)
2088 Points -2%Average of class Gaming (986 - 2474, n=110, last 2 years)
2048 Points -4%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1902 Points -11%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
1846 Points -14%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
1729 Points -19%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
1700 Points -20%HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX
35.3 fps +23%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
30.7 fps +7%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
30.1 fps +5%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
28.7 fps Average of class Gaming (11.5 - 44.3, n=110, last 2 years)
28.1 fps -2%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
26.5 fps -8%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (20.3 - 28.7, n=24)
25.4 fps -11%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
22.7 fps -21%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
21.3 fps -26%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
20.7 fps -28%LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (46.8 - 66.6, n=24)
54 s * -15%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
53.8 s * -15%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
53.6 s * -15%Average of class Gaming (19 - 88.8, n=110, last 2 years)
49.3 s * -5%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
47.5 s * -1%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
46.8 s * Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
45.9 s * +2%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
42.9 s * +8%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
39.7 s * +15%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX
32.9 s * +30%R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
0.503 sec * -26%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.4859 sec * -22%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
0.4457 sec * -12%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
0.4313 sec * -8%Average of class Gaming (0.3439 - 0.759, n=111, last 2 years)
0.4296 sec * -8%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (0.3892 - 0.529, n=24)
0.4124 sec * -4%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
0.4111 sec * -3%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
0.3979 sec * Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3789 sec * +5%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3658 sec * +8%* ... smaller is better
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit3505 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit241 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit310 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)800 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)9250 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core23805 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core2039 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core118 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core1284 Points
Help... in comparison
Performance rating: Percent AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx Performance rating
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
95 pt Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
87.5 pt Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
84.7 pt Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
82.2 pt Average of class Gaming
80.9 pt Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
79.5 pt Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
62.4 pt Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
59.5 pt AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
37324 KRay/s Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (24673 - 37804, n=25)
33780 KRay/s -9%Average of class Gaming (10227 - 85542, n=109, last 2 years)
31633 KRay/s -15%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
30829 KRay/s -17%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
27535 KRay/s -26%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
25682 KRay/s -31%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
18676 KRay/s -50%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
17461 KRay/s -53%AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
150728 Points +6%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
142039 Points Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
136486 Points -4%Average of class Gaming (51376 - 238426, n=109, last 2 years)
136432 Points -4%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (95655 - 148045, n=26)
131225 Points -8%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
127908 Points -10%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
96463 Points -32%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
90983 Points -36%AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
7588 MB/s +30%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
7000 MB/s +20%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
6188 MB/s +6%Average of class Gaming (2180 - 9817, n=109, last 2 years)
6180 MB/s +6%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
5824 MB/s Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (4421 - 5932, n=26)
5421 MB/s -7%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
4534 MB/s -22%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
4278 MB/s -27%AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
148966 Points +68%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
138473 Points +56%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
130803 Points +47%Average of class Gaming (49785 - 173351, n=98, last 2 years)
116364 Points +31%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
94794 Points +7%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
91400 Points +3%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
88891 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (41744 - 99088, n=24)
86324 Points -3%AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
19115 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (16445 - 19120, n=26)
18445 Points -4%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
18114 Points -5%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
16268 Points -15%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
15857 Points -17%Average of class Gaming (4424 - 33636, n=109, last 2 years)
14635 Points -23%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
11095 Points -42%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
11092 Points -42%AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
76668 Points +2%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
75107 Points Average of class Gaming (25115 - 128721, n=109, last 2 years)
71600 Points -5%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (50357 - 93798, n=25)
70024 Points -7%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
68467 Points -9%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
64134 Points -15%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
48020 Points -36%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
45127 Points -40%AIDA64 / CPU AES
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
145389 MB/s +76%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
133395 MB/s +62%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
122937 MB/s +49%Average of class Gaming (39258 - 247074, n=109, last 2 years)
105840 MB/s +28%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
88763 MB/s +8%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (67015 - 118993, n=26)
85583 MB/s +4%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
84774 MB/s +3%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
82547 MB/s AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2239 MB/s +48%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2043 MB/s +35%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
1863 MB/s +23%Average of class Gaming (574 - 2531, n=109, last 2 years)
1529 MB/s +1%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
1514 MB/s Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1077 - 1530, n=26)
1402 MB/s -7%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
1298 MB/s -14%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
1201 MB/s -21%AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
20284 KRay/s Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (13665 - 20648, n=26)
18276 KRay/s -10%Average of class Gaming (5509 - 45446, n=109, last 2 years)
16907 KRay/s -17%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
16655 KRay/s -18%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
14791 KRay/s -27%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
13993 KRay/s -31%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
10078 KRay/s -50%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
9329 KRay/s -54%AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
54702 MPixel/s +6%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
53242 MPixel/s +4%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
52181 MPixel/s +1%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
51417 MPixel/s Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
49616 MPixel/s -4%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
49305 MPixel/s -4%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (36752 - 52671, n=26)
48435 MPixel/s -6%Average of class Gaming (12271 - 89891, n=109, last 2 years)
43881 MPixel/s -15%
系统性能不出所料，新款 Blade 16 是一款速度极快的笔记本电脑，在合成基准测试中也表现出色。我们在测试过程中没有遇到任何问题。只有高级 Optimus 图形切换功能会导致一些轻微的延迟，例如在启动游戏时。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness WebXPRT 3: Overall WebXPRT 4: Overall Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total PCMark 10 / Score
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9017 Points +9%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8401 Points +2%Average of class Gaming (5828 - 11574, n=96, last 2 years)
8354 Points +1%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
8254 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)
8254 Points 0%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
8239 Points 0%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYGeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
7993 Points -3%Alienware x16 R2 P120FGeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7251 Points -12%PCMark 10 / Essentials
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11065 Points +4%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
11007 Points +4%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10915 Points +3%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYGeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
10835 Points +2%Average of class Gaming (8810 - 12600, n=100, last 2 years)
10658 Points 0%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
10626 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)
10626 Points 0%Alienware x16 R2 P120FGeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10036 Points -6%PCMark 10 / Productivity
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11681 Points +13%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11150 Points +8%Average of class Gaming (6845 - 21327, n=98, last 2 years)
10848 Points +5%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
10341 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)
10341 Points 0%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
10202 Points -1%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYGeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
9937 Points -4%Alienware x16 R2 P120FGeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7934 Points -23%PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
15394 Points +11%Average of class Gaming (7602 - 19657, n=98, last 2 years)
13936 Points 0%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
13889 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)
13889 Points 0%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
13516 Points -3%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
13219 Points -5%Alienware x16 R2 P120FGeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
12994 Points -6%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYGeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
12872 Points -7%CrossMark / Overall
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2344 Points Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z
2255 Points Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2149 Points Average of class Gaming (1366 - 2409, n=97, last 2 years)
1982 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)
1956 Points Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1939 Points Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYGeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
1815 Points Alienware x16 R2 P120FGeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1589 Points CrossMark / Productivity
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2162 Points Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z
2042 Points Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2007 Points Average of class Gaming (1386 - 2254, n=97, last 2 years)
1853 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)
1768 Points Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1755 Points Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYGeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
1700 Points Alienware x16 R2 P120FGeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1584 Points CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z
2795 Points Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2660 Points Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2418 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)
2362 Points Average of class Gaming (1343 - 2729, n=97, last 2 years)
2232 Points Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2207 Points Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYGeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
2070 Points Alienware x16 R2 P120FGeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1583 Points CrossMark / Responsiveness
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2045 Points Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1851 Points Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1769 Points Average of class Gaming (1226 - 2334, n=97, last 2 years)
1708 Points Alienware x16 R2 P120FGeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1621 Points Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1595 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)
1505 Points Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYGeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
1490 Points WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z
543 Points +69%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
336 Points +5%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
330 Points +3%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
321 Points Average of class Gaming (242 - 532, n=101, last 2 years)
317 Points -1%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (298 - 321, n=2)
310 Points -3%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYGeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
281 Points -12%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
279 Points -13%Alienware x16 R2 P120FGeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
237 Points -26%WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z
353 Points +32%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
306 Points +14%Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 354, n=101, last 2 years)
285 Points +6%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYGeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
269 Points 0%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
268 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (244 - 268, n=2)
256 Points -4%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
246 Points -8%Alienware x16 R2 P120FGeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
237 Points -12%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Alienware x16 R2 P120FGeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
594 ms * -38%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
535 ms * -25%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYGeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
522 ms * -22%Average of class Gaming (391 - 590, n=106, last 2 years)
464 ms * -8%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
450 ms * -5%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
429 ms * Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
428 ms * -0%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (427 - 429, n=2)
428 ms * -0%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z
256.2 ms * +40%* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score
8254 pointsHelp
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
93766 MB/s 0%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
93640 MB/s Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
89701 MB/s -4%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (71902 - 93640, n=26)
84160 MB/s -10%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
81940 MB/s -12%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78897 MB/s -16%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78799 MB/s -16%Average of class Gaming (21750 - 129946, n=109, last 2 years)
71821 MB/s -23%AIDA64 / Memory Read
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
102937 MB/s Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (81367 - 102937, n=26)
94524 MB/s -8%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86939 MB/s -16%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86387 MB/s -16%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86010 MB/s -16%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
85092 MB/s -17%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
84192 MB/s -18%Average of class Gaming (22956 - 118858, n=109, last 2 years)
73522 MB/s -29%AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
103860 MB/s Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (78939 - 108954, n=26)
94939 MB/s -9%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
80589 MB/s -22%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
77562 MB/s -25%Average of class Gaming (22297 - 135096, n=109, last 2 years)
76026 MB/s -27%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
75937 MB/s -27%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
75421 MB/s -27%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
73199 MB/s -30%AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
142.3 ns * -37%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
137.9 ns * -33%Average of class Gaming (75.3 - 259, n=109, last 2 years)
106.3 ns * -3%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (86.7 - 119.4, n=26)
104.4 ns * -1%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
103.6 ns * Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
96.2 ns * +7%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
83.4 ns * +19%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
76.1 ns * +27%* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟在我们的标准化延迟测试（上网、4K YouTube 视频、CPU 负载）中，采用当前 BIOS 版本的 Razer 笔记本电脑没有显示出任何限制。尽管有一个驱动程序给出了一些提示，但重要的 "中断到进程延迟 "值很低。
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Alienware x16 R2 P120FGeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
16146 μs * -3178%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYGeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
2536.9 μs * -415%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2478.6 μs * -403%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2448.1 μs * -397%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1389.7 μs * -182%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
492.6 μs * * ... smaller is better
存储解决方案我们的测试设备使用的是著名的 SSSTC CA6 的 2-TB 版本，它的传输速率非常高，即使在较长的负载下也能保持稳定的速度。
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpdSSSTC CA6-8D2048CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
6926 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
4965 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
683 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
741 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
70.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
267 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:
2206 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:
3050 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpdSSSTC CA6-8D2048Sequential Read:
5081MB/s
Sequential Write:
4160MB/s
4K Read:
64.4MB/s
4K Write:
230MB/s
4K-64 Read:
2642MB/s
4K-64 Write:
1926MB/s
Access Time Read:
0.051ms
Access Time Write:
0.021ms
Copy ISO:
3359.09MB/s
Copy Program:
1059.28MB/s
Copy Game:
1399.76MB/s
Score Read:
3215Points
Score Write:
2571Points
Score Total:
7379Points
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpdSSSTC CA6-8D2048DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read:
6780MB/s
DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write:
4844MB/s
DiskSpd seq_read:
3790MB/s
DiskSpd seq_write:
3362MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read:
3189MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write:
2210MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read:
69.2MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write:
265MB/s
DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read:
6908MB/s
Drive Performance rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD Drive Performance rating - Percent
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
91.3 pt Alienware x16 R2 P120FWDC PC SN810 1TB
79.4 pt Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
76.6 pt Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048
76.6 pt Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
75.6 pt Average of class Gaming
72.1 pt Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
70.1 pt Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYSamsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
65.2 pt DiskSpd
seq readAlienware x16 R2 P120FWDC PC SN810 1TB
4224 (3741.6min - 4224.02max) MB/s +11%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3795 (3693.04min - 3794.8max) MB/s 0%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
3790 (2816.71min - 3789.94max) MB/s Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)
3790 MB/s 0%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYSamsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
3541 (3501.11min - 3540.88max) MB/s -7%Average of class Gaming (281 - 9494, n=103, last 2 years)
3484 MB/s -8%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
3347 (3203.49min - 3347.47max) MB/s -12%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3015 (2943.98min - 3014.55max) MB/s -20% seq writeAlienware x16 R2 P120FWDC PC SN810 1TB
4899 (4625.25min - 4898.53max) MB/s +46%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4826 (4760.33min - 4825.54max) MB/s +44%Average of class Gaming (1057 - 9832, n=103, last 2 years)
3929 MB/s +17%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3794 (3745.51min - 3793.5max) MB/s +13%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
3750 (3377.21min - 3749.92max) MB/s +12%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
3362 (2028.5min - 3361.51max) MB/s Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)
3362 MB/s 0%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYSamsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
3160 (3033.95min - 3160.41max) MB/s -6% seq q8 t1 readAverage of class Gaming (3772 - 15056, n=103, last 2 years)
7311 MB/s +8%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7140 (5903.9min - 7139.54max) MB/s +5%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYSamsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
7106 (6065.83min - 7105.62max) MB/s +5%Alienware x16 R2 P120FWDC PC SN810 1TB
6823 (5715.47min - 6822.87max) MB/s +1%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
6780 (5762.77min - 6780.16max) MB/s Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)
6780 MB/s 0%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6673 (5801.28min - 6672.72max) MB/s -2%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
6523 (5649.96min - 6522.56max) MB/s -4% seq q8 t1 writeSchenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6860 (6824.33min - 6859.91max) MB/s +42%Average of class Gaming (1218 - 13519, n=103, last 2 years)
5769 MB/s +19%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYSamsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
5248 (5141.58min - 5248.1max) MB/s +8%Alienware x16 R2 P120FWDC PC SN810 1TB
5208 (5161.3min - 5208.07max) MB/s +8%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
5092 (4641.78min - 5091.77max) MB/s +5%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4936 (4909.47min - 4936.28max) MB/s +2%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
4844 (4270.43min - 4843.96max) MB/s Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)
4844 MB/s 0% 4k q1 t1 readAlienware x16 R2 P120FWDC PC SN810 1TB
79.3 (64.25min - 79.25max) MB/s +15%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
71.4 (66.19min - 71.35max) MB/s +3%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYSamsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
69.9 (69.26min - 69.89max) MB/s +1%Average of class Gaming (32.2 - 111.2, n=103, last 2 years)
69.7 MB/s +1%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
69.2 (68.61min - 69.17max) MB/s Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)
69.2 MB/s 0%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
60.5 (49.54min - 60.46max) MB/s -13%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
59.1 (58.3min - 59.06max) MB/s -15% 4k q1 t1 writeRazer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
265 (258.55min - 264.55max) MB/s Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)
265 MB/s 0%Alienware x16 R2 P120FWDC PC SN810 1TB
244 (238.59min - 244.13max) MB/s -8%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
209 (203.44min - 208.84max) MB/s -21%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
205 (202.97min - 204.75max) MB/s -23%Average of class Gaming (78 - 347, n=103, last 2 years)
200 MB/s -25%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
174.4 (160.08min - 174.38max) MB/s -34%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYSamsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
130.3 (127.94min - 130.31max) MB/s -51% 4k q32 t16 readSchenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4920 (4883.21min - 4920.02max) MB/s +54%Alienware x16 R2 P120FWDC PC SN810 1TB
4245 (4210.56min - 4245.12max) MB/s +33%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3726 (3704.12min - 3725.6max) MB/s +17%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
3189 (3182.48min - 3189.1max) MB/s Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)
3189 MB/s 0%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2997 (2834.64min - 2996.72max) MB/s -6%Average of class Gaming (539 - 8067, n=103, last 2 years)
2295 MB/s -28%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYSamsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
597 (590.16min - 596.69max) MB/s -81% 4k q32 t16 writeSchenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4522 (4451.05min - 4521.93max) MB/s +105%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3548 (3533.85min - 3548.33max) MB/s +61%Alienware x16 R2 P120FWDC PC SN810 1TB
2907 (2737.8min - 2907.05max) MB/s +32%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2673 (2401.6min - 2673.33max) MB/s +21%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
2210 (729.15min - 2210.24max) MB/s Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)
2210 MB/s 0%Average of class Gaming (227 - 5653, n=103, last 2 years)
1895 MB/s -14%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYSamsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
393 (388.68min - 393.4max) MB/s -82%AS SSD
Score TotalSchenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9365 Points +27%Alienware x16 R2 P120FWDC PC SN810 1TB
8139 Points +10%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
7379 Points Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)
7379 Points 0%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7040 Points -5%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
6847 Points -7%Average of class Gaming (2912 - 14159, n=101, last 2 years)
6796 Points -8%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYSamsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
5595 Points -24% Score ReadSchenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3496 Points +9%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
3215 Points Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)
3215 Points 0%Alienware x16 R2 P120FWDC PC SN810 1TB
3204 Points 0%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2848 Points -11%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2722 Points -15%Average of class Gaming (953 - 5082, n=101, last 2 years)
2233 Points -31%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYSamsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
1402 Points -56% Score WriteSchenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4062 Points +58%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYSamsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
3588 Points +40%Average of class Gaming (1136 - 6457, n=101, last 2 years)
3492 Points +36%Alienware x16 R2 P120FWDC PC SN810 1TB
3341 Points +30%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2766 Points +8%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2686 Points +4%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
2571 Points Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)
2571 Points 0% Seq ReadSchenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5684.15 MB/s +12%Alienware x16 R2 P120FWDC PC SN810 1TB
5642.41 MB/s +11%Average of class Gaming (2346 - 10091, n=101, last 2 years)
5480 MB/s +8%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYSamsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
5351 MB/s +5%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
5081 MB/s Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)
5081 MB/s 0%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4371 MB/s -14%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2272 MB/s -55% Seq WriteSchenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5612.29 MB/s +35%Alienware x16 R2 P120FWDC PC SN810 1TB
4787.7 MB/s +15%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
4160 MB/s Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)
4160 MB/s 0%Average of class Gaming (114.5 - 10726, n=101, last 2 years)
3889 MB/s -7%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3791 MB/s -9%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
3289 MB/s -21%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYSamsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
2713 MB/s -35% 4K ReadAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYSamsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
72.9 MB/s +13%Alienware x16 R2 P120FWDC PC SN810 1TB
70.48 MB/s +9%Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 108.4, n=101, last 2 years)
69.9 MB/s +9%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
64.4 MB/s Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)
64.4 MB/s 0%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
61.1 MB/s -5%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
59.28 MB/s -8%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
55.9 MB/s -13% 4K WriteSchenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
248.48 MB/s +8%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
230 MB/s Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)
230 MB/s 0%Average of class Gaming (75.6 - 307, n=101, last 2 years)
215 MB/s -7%Alienware x16 R2 P120FWDC PC SN810 1TB
213.62 MB/s -7%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
188.6 MB/s -18%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYSamsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
180.5 MB/s -22%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
160.6 MB/s -30% 4K-64 ReadSchenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2933.61 MB/s +11%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
2642 MB/s Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)
2642 MB/s 0%Alienware x16 R2 P120FWDC PC SN810 1TB
2569.34 MB/s -3%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2439 MB/s -8%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2350 MB/s -11%Average of class Gaming (517 - 3977, n=101, last 2 years)
1615 MB/s -39%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYSamsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
794 MB/s -70% 4K-64 WriteSchenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3252.43 MB/s +69%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYSamsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
3136 MB/s +63%Average of class Gaming (850 - 5356, n=101, last 2 years)
2889 MB/s +50%Alienware x16 R2 P120FWDC PC SN810 1TB
2648.4 MB/s +38%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2226 MB/s +16%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2168 MB/s +13%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
1926 MB/s Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)
1926 MB/s 0% Access Time ReadAlienware x16 R2 P120FWDC PC SN810 1TB
0.09 ms * -76%Average of class Gaming (0.017 - 0.623, n=101, last 2 years)
0.06502 ms * -27%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
0.051 ms * Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)
0.051 ms * -0%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
0.034 ms * +33%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.033 ms * +35%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYSamsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
0.024 ms * +53%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.024 ms * +53% Access Time WriteAlienware x16 R2 P120FWDC PC SN810 1TB
0.055 ms * -162%Average of class Gaming (0.012 - 0.277, n=101, last 2 years)
0.03898 ms * -86%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.025 ms * -19%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYSamsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
0.023 ms * -10%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
0.023 ms * -10%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
0.021 ms * Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)
0.021 ms * -0%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.016 ms * +24%* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6908 (5460.14-6935.25) MB/s
图形卡我们测试的刀锋 16 2025 配备了新的 英伟达GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑配备 24GB VRAM（GDDR7）。图形切换通过 Advanced Optimus 进行，最大 TGP 为 160 瓦（135 瓦 + 最大 25 瓦 Dynamic Boost）。您可以在我们的 我们的 GPU 分析.
合成基准测试的结果喜忧参半：旧版 Blade 16 在所有测试中都被超越，RTX 5090 笔记本电脑根据测试的不同领先 7% 到 20%，而 XMG Neo 16 中的 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑有时表现与旧版 Blade 16 相当。在创作者基准测试（PugetBench）中，5090 笔记本电脑与旧版 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑相比并无优势，但在剪切视频时，额外的 8 GB VRAM 代表着明显的优势。在 Procyon AI 测试中，5090 笔记本电脑领先约 15-17%。在持续负载下，GPU 性能保持稳定。
3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Geekbench 6.7 | GFXBench 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
70760 Points Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
69606 Points -2%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
65956 Points -7%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (26378 - 80022, n=22)
65475 Points -7%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
64341 Points -9%Alienware x16 R2 P120FNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
56772 Points -20%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
54073 Points -24%Average of class Gaming (21841 - 80022, n=108, last 2 years)
48800 Points -31%Razer Blade 17 Early 2022NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
43383 Points -39%3DMark
Steel Nomad ScoreAverage NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (4791 - 6500, n=20)
5889 Points +4%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
5652 Points Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
5102 Points -10%Average of class Gaming (1522 - 6500, n=67, last 2 years)
3975 Points -30%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
3915 Points -31%Razer Blade 17 Early 2022NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
3076 Points -46%2560x1440 Port Royal GraphicsAverage NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (12749 - 17286, n=18)
15876 Points +3%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
15433 Points Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
14107 Points -9%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
13182 Points -15%Alienware x16 R2 P120FNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
11574 Points -25%Average of class Gaming (4395 - 17286, n=71, last 2 years)
10608 Points -31%Razer Blade 17 Early 2022NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
8098 Points -48%1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsRazer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
52065 Points Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
51946 Points 0%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (42175 - 62849, n=27)
51692 Points -1%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
46527 Points -11%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
43518 Points -16%Alienware x16 R2 P120FNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
42558 Points -18%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
40259 Points -23%Average of class Gaming (12242 - 62849, n=120, last 2 years)
38040 Points -27%Razer Blade 17 Early 2022NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
31033 Points -40%2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsAverage NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (19216 - 26212, n=25)
23699 Points +7%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
22134 Points 0%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
22082 Points Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
20416 Points -8%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
19878 Points -10%Alienware x16 R2 P120FNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
18627 Points -16%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
16950 Points -23%Average of class Gaming (5012 - 26212, n=119, last 2 years)
15430 Points -30%Razer Blade 17 Early 2022NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
12405 Points -44% Steel Nomad Light Unlimited ScoreRazer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
25160 Points Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (18775 - 27291, n=8)
24442 Points -3%Average of class Gaming (11971 - 27266, n=17, last 2 years)
19451 Points -23%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max 16-Core
14212 Points -44%Geekbench 6.7
GPU OpenCLAverage NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (181670 - 253130, n=19)
220094 Points +10%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
199973 Points Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
190820 Points -5%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
190540 Points -5%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
167047 Points -16%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
161798 Points -19%Alienware x16 R2 P120FNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
153327 Points -23%Average of class Gaming (67235 - 253130, n=108, last 2 years)
143970 Points -28%Razer Blade 17 Early 2022NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
124227 Points -38%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max 16-Core
116455 Points -42% GPU VulkanRazer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
215511 Points Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
178909 Points -17%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
164105 Points -24%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (22145 - 231659, n=10)
162644 Points -25%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
148584 Points -31%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
132767 Points -38%Razer Blade 17 Early 2022NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
117982 Points -45%Alienware x16 R2 P120FNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
115199 Points -47%Average of class Gaming (7562 - 231659, n=60, last 2 years)
113384 Points -47% GPU MetalApple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max 16-Core
179746 Points GFXBench
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenAverage NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (243 - 267, n=2)
255 fps +5%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
242.8 fps Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max 16-Core
231.7 fps -5%Average of class Gaming (100.4 - 243, n=6, last 2 years)
174.8 fps -28%Razer Blade 17 Early 2022NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
152 fps -37%2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenApple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max 16-Core
515.8 fps +11%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (466 - 557, n=2)
512 fps +10%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
466 fps Average of class Gaming (232 - 507, n=6, last 2 years)
373 fps -20%Razer Blade 17 Early 2022NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
327.6 fps -30%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
64778 points3DMark Vantage P Result
111238 points3DMark 11 Performance
45291 points3DMark Fire Strike Score
37321 points3DMark Time Spy Score
18898 points3DMark Steel Nomad Score
5652 points3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score
22897 points3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
25160 pointsHelp... in comparison
Blender: v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA | v3.3 Classroom CPU | v3.3 Classroom METAL | v4.3 Barbershop OPTIX Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Gaming (9 - 32, n=111, last 2 years)
18.6 Seconds * -43%Alienware x16 R2 P120FNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
15 Seconds * -15%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
13 Seconds * -0%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
13 Seconds * -0%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
13 Seconds * -0%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
13 Seconds * Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
12 Seconds * +8%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9 - 18, n=21)
11.7 Seconds * +10%Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming (15 - 228, n=111, last 2 years)
32.9 Seconds * -73%Alienware x16 R2 P120FNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
22 Seconds * -16%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
20 Seconds * -5%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
19 Seconds * Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
18 Seconds * +5%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
18 Seconds * +5%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (15 - 37, n=20)
17.7 Seconds * +7%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
17 Seconds * +11%Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
305 Seconds * -45%Alienware x16 R2 P120FNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
305 Seconds * -45%Average of class Gaming (122 - 565, n=107, last 2 years)
252 Seconds * -20%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
210 Seconds * Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
202 Seconds * +4%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
193 Seconds * +8%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (123 - 282, n=21)
167.6 Seconds * +20%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
167 Seconds * +20%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max 16-Core
167 Seconds * +20%Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max 16-Core
17.8 Seconds * Blender / v4.3 Barbershop OPTIX
Average of class Gaming (46 - 171, n=29, last 2 years)
71.6 Seconds * -49%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (46 - 286, n=12)
69.3 Seconds * -44%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
48 Seconds * * ... smaller is better
DaVinci Resolve PugetBench | Photoshop PugetBench | Premiere Pro PugetBench DaVinci Resolve PugetBench
Standard Score 1.1Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
8597 Points Extended Score 1.1Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z
8747 Points +7%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
8188 Points Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7802 Points -5%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WIGeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
5804 Points -29%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
5688 Points -31%Photoshop PugetBench - Overall Score 1.01
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z
13859 Points +56%Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053XGeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
9128 Points +3%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
8879 Points Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8353 Points -6%Premiere Pro PugetBench - Overall Score 1.1
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
12662 Points Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z
12412 Points -2%Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053XGeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
12157 Points -4%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11855 Points -6%
UL Procyon for Windows: Overall Image generation Speed | Image Generation Stable Diffusion 1.5 (FP16) UL Procyon for Windows /
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
4.2 s/image * -121%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WIGeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
4.1 s/image * -116%Alienware m18 R2GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
2.2 s/image * -16%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
1.9 s/image * UL Procyon for Windows /
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
3322 Points Alienware m18 R2GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
2845 Points -14%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WIGeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
1518 Points -54%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1474 Points -56%* ... smaller is better
游戏性能现在我们来看看游戏性能，其中我们区分了原生测试和升级基准测试。在这一点上，GeForce RTX 5000 系列的全新多帧生成技术尤其引人关注。在原生测试中，你可以清楚地看到较弱的 AMD 处理器限制了 1080p 的性能，这也是新的 Blade 16 在这里表现不如预期的原因。从 QHD 分辨率开始，情况就发生了变化，在 4K 分辨率下，5090 笔记本电脑的优势非常明显，甚至在激活光线追踪后还会增加。
Performance rating | Cyberpunk 2077 | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 Performance rating - Percent
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
99.8 pt Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 -1! Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
88 pt Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
87 pt Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
75.1 pt Average of class Gaming
74.8 pt Alienware x16 R2 P120F -1! Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
72.4 pt Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
67.9 pt Razer Blade 17 Early 2022Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62.8 pt Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max -5! Apple M4 Max 16-Core, Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU
44.5 pt Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
131.5 (62.2min) fps +25%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
127 (70.6min) fps +21%Average of class Gaming (17.7 - 169.9, n=120, last 2 years)
105.8 fps 0%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
105.3 (74.7min) fps Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
99.7 (13.5min) fps -5%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
95.35 (70.51min) fps -9%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
93.1 (64.5min) fps -12%Razer Blade 17 Early 2022Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
91.43 (74.13min) fps -13%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 16-Core, Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU
47.4 fps -55%Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
187 fps +15%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
175.8 (48.1P0.1, 125.3P1) fps +9%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
162 fps Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
159.4 fps -2%Average of class Gaming (59.4 - 246, n=107, last 2 years)
137 fps -15%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
118 fps -27%Razer Blade 17 Early 2022Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
117.7 (30.8P0.1, 73.7P1) fps -27%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 16-Core, Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU
99 fps -39%GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
159.3 (3.25min, 125P1) fps +31%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
138.1 (4.19min, 83.3P1) fps +14%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
136.2 (0.938min, 111.1P1) fps +12%Average of class Gaming (48.3 - 186.9, n=101, last 2 years)
129.6 fps +7%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
121.6 (8.28min, 83.3P1) fps Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
107.1 (3.03min, 66.7P1) fps -12%Razer Blade 17 Early 2022Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
106 (25.5min, 76.9P1) fps -13%Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
196.9 fps +34%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
165.1 fps +12%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
147.4 fps Average of class Gaming (41 - 215, n=102, last 2 years)
145.3 fps -1%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
139.8 fps -5%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
138 fps -6%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
137.5 fps -7%Razer Blade 17 Early 2022Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
112.2 fps -24%Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
403 (101.2min, 295P1) fps +26%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
369 (5min, 269P1) fps +16%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
359.8 (30.2min, 253P1) fps +13%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
319 (126.4min, 227P1) fps Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
293 (38.3min, 184.1P1) fps -8%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
288 fps -10%Average of class Gaming (76.3 - 456, n=92, last 2 years)
279 fps -13%Razer Blade 17 Early 2022Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
204 (124.8min, 152.6P1) fps -36%Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
194.6 (165.7min) fps +42%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
188.1 (155.2min) fps +37%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
164.5 (136min) fps +20%Average of class Gaming (84.8 - 248, n=112, last 2 years)
152.7 fps +11%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
138.7 (119.5min) fps +1%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
137.1 (113.2min) fps Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
133 (114.6min) fps -3%Razer Blade 17 Early 2022Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
131.9 (114.9min) fps -4%X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
146.2 fps +72%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
144.5 fps +70%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
125.6 fps +47%Average of class Gaming (52.1 - 143.5, n=115, last 2 years)
98.1 fps +15%Razer Blade 17 Early 2022Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
95.6 fps +12%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
90 fps +6%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
89.3 fps +5%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
85.2 fps
Cyberpunk 2077 | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Assassin's Creed Shadows | Monster Hunter Wilds | Alan Wake 2 | F1 24 | Black Myth: Wukong | Indiana Jones and the Great Circle Cyberpunk 2077 - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (83.2 - 122.8, n=27)
108.3 fps +10%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
98.6 (74.5min) fps Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
93.8 (53.7min) fps -5%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86 (70.4min) fps -13%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
83.39 (67.14min) fps -15%Average of class Gaming (24.8 - 122.8, n=94, last 2 years)
77.5 fps -21%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
75.4 (25.4min) fps -24%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
68.1 (55.3min) fps -31%Razer Blade 17 Early 2022Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
57.12 (47.51min) fps -42%Baldur's Gate 3 - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (103.1 - 174.8, n=25)
146.8 fps +6%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
138.8 fps Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
134 (37.2P0.1, 78.7P1) fps -3%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
133.2 fps -4%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
124.3 fps -10%Average of class Gaming (56.5 - 175.5, n=85, last 2 years)
107.5 fps -23%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
99 fps -29%Razer Blade 17 Early 2022Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
84.4 (15.2P0.1, 51.2P1) fps -39%GTA V - 2560x1440 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
156 (4.52min, 111.1P1) fps +29%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (62.7 - 183.9, n=17)
142.8 fps +18%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
138.9 (0.96min, 100P1) fps +14%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
126.9 (3.16min, 83.3P1) fps +5%Average of class Gaming (36.9 - 183.9, n=75, last 2 years)
122.4 fps +1%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
121.4 (6.17min, 83.3P1) fps Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
103.4 (2.58min, 58.8P1) fps -15%Razer Blade 17 Early 2022Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
102.7 (19.3min, 71.4P1) fps -15%Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 2560x1440 High Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (123.4 - 184.3, n=24)
164 fps +18%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
162.5 fps +16%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
142 fps +2%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
139.5 fps Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
126.8 fps -9%Average of class Gaming (32.5 - 184.3, n=89, last 2 years)
121.5 fps -13%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
120.8 fps -13%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
113.3 fps -19%Razer Blade 17 Early 2022Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
90.8 fps -35%Assassin's Creed Shadows - 2560x1440 Ultra High
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (37 - 64, n=19)
55.3 fps +11%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
52 (20min, 22P0.1, 30P1) fps +4%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
50 (31min, 33P0.1, 39P1) fps Average of class Gaming (22 - 64, n=48, last 2 years)
45.6 fps -9%Monster Hunter Wilds - 2560x1440 ultra, RT: high, no upscaling
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (54 - 80.5, n=11)
71.5 fps +9%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
65.61 fps Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
63.11 fps -4%Average of class Gaming (13.9 - 80.5, n=24, last 2 years)
57.6 fps -12%Alan Wake 2 - 2560x1440 High Preset
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
87.1 (51.7min, 55.3P0.1, 66.2P1) fps +14%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (57.6 - 93.1, n=16)
84 fps +10%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78.4 (17P0.1, 52.8P1) fps +2%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
76.7 (16.3P0.1, 33P1) fps Average of class Gaming (31.2 - 93.1, n=33, last 2 years)
69 fps -10%F1 24 - 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (72.5 - 106.9, n=22)
96.6 fps +2%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
94.9 (50min, 66P1) fps Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
84.7 (69min, 68P1) fps -11%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
72.1 (2min, 56P1) fps -24%Average of class Gaming (29.8 - 106.9, n=60, last 2 years)
71.1 fps -25%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
58.5 (49min, 47P1) fps -38%Black Myth: Wukong - 2560x1440 cinematic TSR 100
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (42 - 50, n=8)
45.9 fps +4%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
44 (38min, 40P1) fps Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
39 (32min) fps -11%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
39 (45min) fps -11%Average of class Gaming (19 - 50, n=25, last 2 years)
36.4 fps -17%Indiana Jones and the Great Circle - 2560x1440 Very Ultra Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (66.1 - 121.9, n=16)
103.7 fps +7%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
97.3 (65.6P0.1, 75.1P1) fps Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
95.4 (54P0.1, 66.7P1) fps -2%Average of class Gaming (4.2 - 121.9, n=33, last 2 years)
75.5 fps -22%
Cyberpunk 2077 | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Assassin's Creed Shadows | Monster Hunter Wilds | Alan Wake 2 | F1 24 | Black Myth: Wukong | Indiana Jones and the Great Circle Cyberpunk 2077 - 3840x2160 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (39.6 - 55.1, n=18)
51.5 fps +2%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
50.7 (42.1min) fps Average of class Gaming (21.5 - 128.8, n=36, last 2 years)
44.7 fps -12%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
39.61 fps -22%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
32.9 (28.4min) fps -35%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
32.5 (11.5min) fps -36%Razer Blade 17 Early 2022Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
25.46 (21.66min) fps -50%Baldur's Gate 3 - 3840x2160 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (62.2 - 94, n=17)
82.8 fps +5%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
79.1 fps Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
74 (36.7P0.1, 52.6P1) fps -6%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
73.1 fps -8%Average of class Gaming (34.8 - 94, n=32, last 2 years)
68.5 fps -13%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
65 fps -18%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
57 fps -28%Razer Blade 17 Early 2022Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
46 (28.7P0.1, 37.9P1) fps -42%GTA V - 3840x2160 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (84.4 - 116.7, n=10)
105.8 fps +25%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
84.4 (11.7min) fps Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
83.2 fps -1%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
82.7 (0.919min, 55.6P1) fps -2%Average of class Gaming (40.5 - 116.7, n=25, last 2 years)
82.1 fps -3%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
69 (2.17min, 43.5P1) fps -18%Razer Blade 17 Early 2022Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
63 fps -25%Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 3840x2160 High Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (83.4 - 111.8, n=16)
102.2 fps +6%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
96.8 fps Average of class Gaming (45 - 111.8, n=34, last 2 years)
83.8 fps -13%Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
70.2 fps -27%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
68.9 fps -29%Razer Blade 17 Early 2022Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
55.2 fps -43%Assassin's Creed Shadows - 3840x2160 Ultra High
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (35 - 46, n=15)
40.8 fps +17%Average of class Gaming (14 - 46, n=24, last 2 years)
36.1 fps +3%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
35 (16min, 22P0.1, 27P1) fps Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
34 (10min, 18P0.1, 25P1) fps -3%Monster Hunter Wilds - 3840x2160 ultra, RT: high, no upscaling
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (33.4 - 50.8, n=11)
45.7 fps +4%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
44.07 fps Average of class Gaming (10.6 - 50.8, n=18, last 2 years)
42 fps -5%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
40.46 fps -8%Alan Wake 2 - 3840x2160 High Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (33.4 - 49.9, n=13)
45.4 fps +6%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
43 (12.9P0.1, 25.7P1) fps Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
41.6 (20P0.1, 31.8P1) fps -3%Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 49.9, n=21, last 2 years)
39.3 fps -9%F1 24 - 3840x2160 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (39.3 - 54.2, n=16)
49.2 fps +1%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
48.8 (41min, 40P1) fps Average of class Gaming (10.7 - 53.6, n=24, last 2 years)
41.6 fps -15%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
30.3 (25min, 24P1) fps -38%Black Myth: Wukong - 3840x2160 cinematic TSR 100
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (26 - 33, n=8)
28.3 fps +5%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
27 (22min, 25P1) fps Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
23 (18min) fps -15%Average of class Gaming (7 - 33, n=19, last 2 years)
23 fps -15%Indiana Jones and the Great Circle - 3840x2160 Very Ultra Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (48.2 - 73, n=13)
65.7 fps +5%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
62.3 (50.6P0.1, 52.7P1) fps Average of class Gaming (5.3 - 73, n=19, last 2 years)
58.7 fps -6%Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
58 (37.4P0.1, 46.3P1) fps -7%
Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra FPS Chart
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø107.9 (97.6-110.3) fps
赛博朋克 2077 1080p 超 CPU/GPU 数据 新一代GeForce 50xx 的主要功能是多帧生成。在我们使用《赛博朋克 2077》进行的测试中，我们看到了性能的大幅提升，尤其是在 MFG(x4) 中。但你必须小心，因为在游戏过程中，印象会发生变化，而且还有点取决于原生性能。例如，在 WQHD 分辨率下，MFG(x4) 运行得非常好，但在外接显示器的 4K 分辨率下，快速移动时图像看起来略显模糊。
Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom Liberty
分辨率
预设
原生
DLSS（自动）
DLSS（自动）+ FG（x2）
DLSS（自动）+ FG（x4）
QHD
Ultra
98.6 FPS
104.3 FPS
189.9 FPS
321.2 FPS
QHD
RT Overdrive
26.8 FPS
58.4 FPS
99.1 FPS
185.1 FPS
4K
Ultra
50.7 FPS
84.5 FPS
130.9 FPS
219.9 FPS
4K
RT Overdrive
12.6 FPS
43.2 FPS
69.2 FPS
121.5 FPS
通过《赛博朋克 2077》和《艾伦-威克 2》这两款游戏，我们还比较了 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑的游戏性能、 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑(刀锋 16 2024）和 RTX 3080 Ti 笔记本电脑(刀锋 17) 在所有可用的升频技术与最大设置相结合的情况下相互对比。在这里你可以清楚地看到，由于采用了 MFG（x4）技术，新的 5090 笔记本电脑与 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑相比优势明显。但在其他设置下，优势并不明显，不足以成为购买新产品的理由。另一方面，与 RTX 3080 Ti 笔记本电脑相比，其优势则非常明显。
赛博朋克 2077
艾伦-威克 2
lowmed.highultraQHD DLSSQHD4K DLSS4KGTA V (2015)
121.6
121.4
150.7
The Witcher 3 (2015)
192
151
129
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
173.9
152.7
143.3
137.1
133
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)
174.7
167.8
147.4
139.5
96.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
109.4
103.6
85.2
71.3
Strange Brigade (2018)
404
341
322
319
303
174.6
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)
180
175
163.5
162
138.8
124.2
79.1
Cyberpunk 2077 (2023)
125.8
115.4
117.8
105.3
104.6
98.6
50.7
Alan Wake 2 (2023)
95.2
76.7
43
F1 24 (2024)
236
236
236
133
130.7
94.9
80.5
48.8
Black Myth: Wukong (2024)
57
64
44
46
27
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024)
119.6
113.9
97.3
62.3
Monster Hunter Wilds (2025)
68.06
68.57
65.61
57.59
44.07
Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025)
64
62
50
47
35
Forza Horizon 6 (2026)
131
113
75
88
63
50
36
排放 - 大型蒸汽腔噪音排放冷却装置Razer 使用两个风扇和一个巨大的蒸汽室进行散热。即使是非常简单的任务，风扇也几乎始终运转，产生约 30 分贝（A）的轻微呼啸声。在游戏时，噪音会达到 48 dB(A)，在压力测试中最高可达 53 dB(A)。但为了公平起见，我们还必须提到 ROG Zephyrus G162024 的噪音更大，尽管其游戏性能更低。我们的测试设备没有产生任何其他电子噪音。
Noise level
Idle
24.1 / 30.6 / 30.6 dB(A)Load
45.5 / 53.4 dB(A)
30 dBsilent40 dB(A)audible50 dB(A)loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.1 dB(A)
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP1024ZSchenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TBAlienware x16 R2 P120FGeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TBLenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFHAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYGeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLBRazer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLBNoise12%-6%9%12%-2%9%off / environment * (dB)24.124.1 -0%26 -8%23.4 3%23 5%24.6 -2%23 5%Idle Minimum * (dB)24.124.1 -0%28 -16%23.8 1%23 5%24.6 -2%23 5%Idle Average * (dB)30.624.1 21%29 5%28.5 7%23 25%27.8 9%23 25%Idle Maximum * (dB)30.624.1 21%31 -1%28.5 7%23 25%31.9 -4%27.66 10%Load Average * (dB)45.542.2 7%51 -12%28.8 37%39 14%49.2 -8%43.76 4%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB)48.242.2 12%52.3 -9%Load Maximum * (dB)53.442.2 21%56 -5%54.2 -1%55.56 -4%52.3 2%50.37 6%Witcher 3 ultra * (dB)5449.555.3246.81* ... smaller is better
温度在闲置状态下，铝制机壳仍然非常凉爽，但在负载情况下，我们测得底部温度超过 50 °C（122 °F）。因此，在这种情况下，不应将设备放在膝盖上，并确保良好的通风。键盘的部分区域也会明显升温，尽管对游戏玩家非常重要的 WASD 区域仍然保持舒适的低温。在压力测试过程中，CPU 和 GPU 之间的比例在一段时间后会发生一些变化，但总体而言 GPU 仍然明显占优。在最大功率下，Blade 16 能够持续冷却近 180 瓦的功率。
CPU/GPU 压力测试数据
Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk
44.4 °C48.3 °C44.8 °C 38.4 °C45.9 °C39.3 °C 33.4 °C36.4 °C36.3 °C
Maximum: 48.3 °CAverage: 40.8 °C
46.2 °C53.3 °C44.9 °C45 °C51.3 °C47.8 °C34.9 °C35.8 °C34.2 °C
Maximum: 53.3 °CAverage: 43.7 °C Power Supply (max.) 41.1 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk
27.4 °C28 °C28.3 °C 27.9 °C28.3 °C27.4 °C 25.5 °C25.4 °C25.2 °C
Maximum: 28.3 °CAverage: 27 °C
29.1 °C30.1 °C29.4 °C29.1 °C30.3 °C29.6 °C25.6 °C25.8 °C26 °C
Maximum: 30.3 °CAverage: 28.3 °C Power Supply (max.) 25.1 °C | Room Temperature 20.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk
41.2 °C44.6 °C41 °C 33.8 °C41.7 °C37.2 °C 30.5 °C32.3 °C32 °C
Maximum: 44.6 °CAverage: 37.1 °C
45.6 °C48.3 °C42.8 °C42.4 °C46.9 °C41.8 °C32.6 °C33.7 °C32.2 °C
Maximum: 48.3 °CAverage: 40.7 °C Power Supply (max.) 36.2 °C | Room Temperature 20.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.3 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.4 °C / 97.5 F. (-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-7.6 °C / -13.7 F).
应力测试表面温度（顶部）
应力测试表面温度（底部）
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 LaptopApple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 16-Core, Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPUSchenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPUAlienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPULenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPUAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPURazer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPUHeat18%4%-12%-20%9%6%Maximum Upper Side * (°C)48.342.8 11%47 3%51 -6%56 -16%45.9 5%45 7%Maximum Bottom * (°C)53.342.3 21%56 -5%50.8 5%53 1%47.5 11%45 16%Idle Upper Side * (°C)28.323.6 17%27 5%36.6 -29%38 -34%26.1 8%29 -2%Idle Bottom * (°C)30.323.5 22%27 11%35.2 -16%39 -29%26.6 12%30 1%* ... smaller is better
发言人在瘦身计划的影响下，扬声器的质量受到了一些影响。 ROG Zephyrus G16表明，在这方面还可以做得更好。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.8% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)Compared to same class» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 67% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%Compared to all devices tested» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.3% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)Compared to same class» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 82% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%Compared to all devices tested» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.4% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (8.2% difference to median)Compared to same class» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%Compared to all devices tested» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.96 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (11.3% difference to median)Compared to same class» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%Compared to all devices tested» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(+) | good bass - only 3.3% away from median(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (6.5% difference to median)Compared to same class» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%Compared to all devices tested» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.16 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)Compared to same class» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%Compared to all devices tested» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.1% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (4.8% difference to median)Compared to same class» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 改进电池寿命耗电量280 瓦充电器在我们的功耗测量中，处理器的速度较慢和 GPU 的 TGP 较低当然是显而易见的。Blade 16 2025 在所有情况下都更加高效。它还只配备了一个 280 瓦的充电器（之前为 330 瓦），但这已经完全足够了。在压力测试开始时，我们测得的最大功率接近 250 瓦，大约 45 秒后降到 220 瓦。
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.21 / 0.29 WattIdle 10.9 / 13.5 / 13.7 Watt
Load
120.2 / 246.1 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, SSSTC CA6-8D2048, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 16-Core, M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2"Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"Alienware x16 R2 P120FUltra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH, MiniLED, 3200x2000, 16"Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYUltra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop Average of class Gaming Power Consumption20%-27%-30%-69%15%-34%-60%-26%Idle Minimum * (Watt)10.94.7 57%6 45%9.9 9%20.5 -88%7.8 28%16.9 -55%16.2 ?(4.4 - 38.4, n=20) -49%13.1 ?(3 - 41.5, n=102, last 2 years) -20%Idle Average * (Watt)13.515.5 -15%16 -19%14.5 -7%27.7 -105%10.9 19%17.8 -32%24.3 ?(7.6 - 45.6, n=20) -80%18.7 ?(6.5 - 53.5, n=102, last 2 years) -39%Idle Maximum * (Watt)13.715.6 -14%28 -104%33.5 -145%32.1 -134%11.6 15%19.6 -43%30.3 ?(7.8 - 57.5, n=20) -121%24.4 ?(7.5 - 57.5, n=102, last 2 years) -78%Load Average * (Watt)120.2125 -4%130 -8%97.5 19%105 13%98.7 18%128 -6%135.3 ?(88 - 190.1, n=20) -13%108.1 ?(59.3 - 190.1, n=100, last 2 years) 10%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt)178.2116.2 35%157.3 12%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt)177.6107.2 40%165.5 7%Load Maximum * (Watt)246.1143.7 42%361 -47%315.2 -28%323 -31%232 6%328 -33%336 ?(217 - 431, n=20) -37%254 ?(115 - 431, n=102, last 2 years) -3%Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt)302230246243* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø225 (215-246) WattRazer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø12.8 (7.68-16.5) WattRazer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø178.2 (174.3-182.6) Watt
Power Consumption with External Monitor
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø100.6 (97.6-122.6) WattRazer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø130.3 (107.6-145.5) WattRazer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø31.8 (27.3-73.9) WattRazer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø103.2 (99.8-106.4) WattRazer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø195.4 (160-203) WattRazer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø7.63 (6.03-12.4) WattRazer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø177.6 (171.1-181.9) Watt
电池寿命现在的电池容量比以前略低，只有 90 Wh。不过，电池续航时间仍然比以前要长，我们测得在全亮度状态下可使用近 8 小时或 5.5 小时。在电池工作状态下也可以玩游戏，但只能持续略多于一小时。Nvidia 的 "电池提升 "功能可以改善电池续航时间，该功能可根据情况将人工智能的性能限制在 30 FPS 左右。但效果并不理想，至少在《赛博朋克》中是如此（约 22-24 FPS）。
电池信息
充电过程
Battery Runtime
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd
1h 11min
WiFi Websurfing
7h 55min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
5h 31min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 52min
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 WhApple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 16-Core, M4 Max 40-Core GPU, 99.6 WhSchenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.8 WhAlienware x16 R2 P120FUltra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 WhLenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.99 WhAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYUltra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 WhRazer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 95.2 WhAverage of class Gaming Battery runtime124%-28%-59%-45%-18%-27%-14%H.264 (h)9.921.8 120%7 -29%4.9 -51%7.6 -23%8.26 ?(2.15 - 15, n=23, last 2 years) -17%WiFi v1.3 (h)7.918 128%5.8 -27%3.2 -59%4.8 -39%6.5 -18%5.5 -30%7.04 ?(1.967 - 14.6, n=102, last 2 years) -11%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd (h)1.2
Notebookcheck 整体估值
Back to the verdict
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
- 03/26/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Chassis90 / 98 → 92%
Keyboard86%
Pointing Device93%
Connectivity74 / 80 → 92%
Weight62 / 10-68 → 90%
Battery76 / 95 → 80%
Display87%
Games Performance89%
Application Performance90%
Temperature83 / 95 → 88%
Noise69 / 90 → 76%
Audio85%
Camera31 / 75 → 41%
Average62%
87%
Gaming - Weighted Average
CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials0%Packaging50%Power Use84.1%Repairability40%Software Updates22.3% Total Sustainability Score: 32.7%
Possible Alternatives in Comparison
ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightHeightDisplay
1.87%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSDAmazon: List Price: 4399€2.1 kg17.4 mm16.00"2560x1600189 PPIOLED
2.91.7%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 16-Core ⎘ Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU ⎘48 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: List Price: 4699€2.1 kg16.8 mm16.20"3456x2234254 PPIMini-LED
3.85.5%Schenker XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: List Price: 3800 Euro2.5 kg26.6 mm16.00"2560x1600189 PPIIPS
4.88.4% v7 (old)Alienware x16 R2 P120FIntel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: List Price: 3200 USD2.7 kg18.57 mm16.00"2560x1600189 PPIIPS
5.83.9%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSDAmazon: List Price: 4899 Euro2.5 kg22.7 mm16.00"3200x2000236 PPIMiniLED
6.86.1%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYIntel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSDAmazon: List Price: 4300€1.9 kg16.4 mm16.00"2560x1600189 PPIOLED
7.91.1% v7 (old)Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSDAmazon: List Price: 4850 Euro2.5 kg22 mm16.00"2560x1600189 PPIOLED
More articles related to this deviceRazer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 (Blade 16 Series)News•Razer Blade 16：低性能静音模式下的游戏可能真的值得一玩 |News•Razer Blade 16 采用英特尔而非 AMD 技术，电池续航时间延长数小时 |News•2026 Razer Blade 16 将 AMD 换成英特尔，效果显著 |News•最新的 Razer Blade 16 比以前亮了两倍，对 HDR 的支持显著增强 |Review•Razer Blade 16 评测：英特尔酷睿处理器带来更快的帧速率 |Review•Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 笔记本电脑评测：几乎一样快，却便宜很多 |Review•配备 RTX 5090 的最轻薄游戏笔记本 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 与 Razer Blade 16 对比 |Review•NvidiaGeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑分析--速度更快，但还有更多惊喜等着你 |Review•Razer Blade 16 (2024) 笔记本电脑评测：配备超高速三星 OLED 显示屏 |Review•Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090评论：酷睿i9-13950HX巨兽，全球首款双模迷你LED UHD+显示屏 |News•移动GeForce RTX 4080比桌面RTX 4080慢35%，这对消费者来说可能是个问题 |Review•Nvidia Ada RTX 40笔记本GPU分析：175W RTX 4090笔记本GPU在性能和功率效率方面超过了350W RTX 3090 |Review•移动GeForce RTX 4080首次亮相。Razer Blade 16 Early 2023笔记本电脑评测
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 549 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 794906 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via: